IHHT and classic altitude training are both based on the principle of reduced oxygen availability — but differ fundamentally in terms of control and application. The key difference lies in control.
Controlled conditions: IHHT takes place in a precisely controllable environment in which oxygen concentration, duration and intensity can be adjusted in a targeted way. Training in the mountains, by contrast, is dictated by altitude, weather and duration of stay, and can only be influenced to a limited extent.
Structured sequence: IHHT works with short, repeated alternations between hypoxia and recovery phases. At real altitude, exposure is continuous over extended periods.
Individual adaptability: IHHT can be flexibly adjusted to personal conditions and goals. Classic altitude training offers this kind of individualisation only to a limited extent.
Practical implementation: IHHT is independent of geography and can be integrated into existing training or recovery concepts. Altitude training, on the other hand, requires travel to specific regions and involves considerably more organisational effort.
In summary: While altitude training is based on natural but hardly controllable conditions, IHHT enables targeted and reproducible application under controlled circumstances.